Wednesday, December 07, 2011

The Cain Atrocity

One of the stated reasons Newt Gingrich is on the rise is that people desire to see him debate Obama. They believe he will rain down an intellectual onslaught of conservative principles and common sense upon the self proclaimed smartest President in the room. But one ever really knows what will come out of Newt’s mouth; what the flavor of the day will be.

I wanted to see Herman Cain debate Obama and was a bit mystified why few to no others had expressed the same desire. A genuine black man speaking truth to power. A man who can say, “My daddy always said…” to give us that homespun wisdom that was all to common in the black community in days long gone. As opposed to someone who never had a father figure and as far as we can tell never had any friends or girlfriends either.

When Obama was elected many, even some on the left, had to admit the days of racism were fading into the past. Obama’s inauguration was a brief moment all could feel a sense of satisfaction in.

Yet, as Herman Cain rose to prominence as a presidential candidate he was met with the most vile stereotypical portrayal of the black man that has ever existed, that black men are womanizers, and no said a word. All the allegations against him are unfounded to date, yet the liberal media had no hesitation to vilify the man Herman Cain. And how easy was it for many, based on these racist stereotypes that have existed in our society, to just accept the allegations as true.

The perversions of Ted Kennedy and company didn’t disqualify him from public office. It was similar in regards to Barney Frank’s residential peculiarities. Hardly a whimper was made out of senator John Edwards long standing affair as his wife was dying of cancer. Denying his love child was just par for the course of a politician.

Would a white republican have stepped down in the face of such unproven allegations as those that Herman Cain was accused of. Perhaps. But the complete dismissal that Herman Cain was given would not have happened. The stories would have been reported as a backdrop to the overall electability of the candidate in relation to his positions and the overall vigor of his campaign. Such allegations would have been portrayed as yet to unfold, rather than declared an end to a candidacy.

Yes, the media is hypocritical in their treatment of republicans versus democrats. But it is also clear to me that racists tendencies have not been stripped from the general society. And the party that proclaims themselves the defenders against racism, along with their media allies, have no scruples in playing off these hateful stereotypes when it serves their purpose. Why? Because racism exits much more strongly on the left than the right.

But the left is just warming up. If Newt Gingrich should win the candidacy look out Catholics. Yes, his past life and the many women it entails will be brought up in the darkest most disgusting detail and …is it any wonder that he converted to Catholicism? Remember all those Priests abuse cases? Newt fits right in doesn’t he? It is only natural that he would be attracted to such a faith.

Too much of a stretch for the left? Really!

And then there is Mitt Romney, the candidate the big government political machine, a truly bipartisan entity, is putting forward. He’s a Mormon. There is regrettably a solid minority group of Christians that will not vote for a Mormon, period. So a portion of the much needed base is gone.

But Mitt will bring the middle even among the enormity of the inevitable cult allegations. …Riiiight.

I don’t have a problem with Mormons. Most conservative do not. But Mitt is not a strong conservative and he will be savaged, along with his faith, during the presidential campaign. This leaves the door wide open for a third party candidate.

And though one of the bright spots in Mitt Romney’s career is his rescue of the Salt Lake City Olympics from widespread corruption, the Salt Lake City Olympics were in Salt Lake City; the center of the Mormon faith. What does that say about Mormons and Mormonism?

We will hear about every polygamist group in Mormonism. And if any relative, no matter how distant, of Mitt Romney ever had more than one wife we will here about it. We will hear about his ancestors/relatives lives with their multiple wives more than Romney’s own life.

Mormonism, Mormons, Mormon run businesses and practices will face unending ridicule and attack to an unbelievable degree. And their image as a cult will be pushed to such an extent that it will make John Smith and his ilk look worse than Charles Manson.

“Oh! how could that be, you little know nothing blogger?” you ask? Have you heard of “September Dawn;” a film based on a 1857 massacre of a wagon train of 120 men women and children by Mormons and their native American allies? The movie is factually inaccurate but when has that ever discouraged the media from reporting the truth?

Mitt Romney will not carry the middle under these attacks.

So is it true that anyone can beat Obama? I think if Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney win the nomination all those of conservative persuasion will look back and say, “I wish we had Herman Cain or Rick Perry or Michele Bachman or… as our candidate. Anything would have been better than this.

I have not put forward anything detrimental to Newt or Mitt. These attacks are ready and waiting for the right time to be made. The mistake many in this nation are making is to underestimate the hate that drives the left.

No comments: