Recently the governor of Wisconsin Scott Walker, my governor, received a crank call ( that's what we called them when we made them, when I was twelve years old, crank not prank) from a liberal blogger, claiming to be a predominant conservative businessman, David Koch. A businessman who donates to conservative and libertarian causes, and holds substantial business interests in the State of Wisconsin.
Trying to trap Scott Walker in some scandalous mis-statement, the only thing we all discovered was that our governor says the same thing in private as he does in public.
When I first started this blog, my first, and now one of many, I visited a liberal west coast blog on a regular basis to comment on their postings. My sound conservative arguments soon caught their ire. First I was accused of being ignorant, invalidating my entire reasoning because of typos such as typing 'alot' rather than 'a lot.'
I was threatened with being blocked from posting on their blog. A blog that I will not mention, because I have decided it is not worth contributing to the liberal cause, by giving them the privilege of my patronage or the attentions of others. I was always courteous when I posted back then, and on some very rare and miraculous occasions we actually found common ground. So I was never blocked.
I was further accused of being a republican operative, spreading talking points coming down from on high. To which I proclaimed myself a free thinker. Then one day I received a call. A very passionate sounding woman, claiming to be a secretary from some office in the republican party was on the line. She claimed she had something very important for me to help them with, but before she could finish I said; "I'm a conservative, not a republican." And hung up the phone.
This was nearly five years ago. A few seconds after I hung up I asked myself; "Was that Becky?" One of several posters from the liberal blog with whom I had the most heated debates. It was a natural conclusion as I really had no connections with the republican party, outside of some small donations for the Bush 43 campaign. And I had been thickly accused on the subject blog of being an operative. And just the feeling I had about the call. I received plenty of fundraising calls but this was completely different.
The left has no scruples. They hold no commitment to basic attributes of good character. These tricks are not new. Governor Walker should have staff that are more competent. I heard a description of how the crank caller got through, and some one should be fired.
But ultimately, it is not just protecting the union money that goes towards democrat campaigns that has brought Wisconsin under assault. Yes, what is happening in Wisconsin, and other states, is a threat to the money supply, and the liberal's goals for complete control. But focus is also being directed at Wisconsin, and governor Walker, for the same reason the left focuses smear campaigns against Sarah Palin. They do not want Scott Walker, son of a minister, to get anywhere near the Presidency.
I cannot see Scott Walker running in 2012. We need him too much here, and I don't know who could possibly replace him. And he just started. But in six to ten years.... This is a true Reagan conservative who does what is right, and will not be changed.
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Monday, February 21, 2011
Happy President's Day
Happy President's Day to all. As a citizen of Wisconsin there is nothing I can really add to the coverage, of the opposition to our governor, that has been going on. Being covered so deeply, most anything that could be said has been said. And I would share the opinion expressed here.
It was Mark Levin who I first heard explain clearly and flawlessly, maybe years ago now, the inherent conflict of interest that exists when you allow public workers to unionize. Their dues going to support candidates who decide their wages and benefits.
I hope as a nation we can always honor what deserves to be honored; President's like George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, and Ronald Reagan. And hopefully many more in the future.
It was Mark Levin who I first heard explain clearly and flawlessly, maybe years ago now, the inherent conflict of interest that exists when you allow public workers to unionize. Their dues going to support candidates who decide their wages and benefits.
I hope as a nation we can always honor what deserves to be honored; President's like George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, and Ronald Reagan. And hopefully many more in the future.
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
The 111th Congress, Jared Laughner, and the Rest of Us... and lets throw in the 112th Congress
Can we delete the 111th Congress? Take back, invalidate, repeal the entirety of the legislation passed in the 111th Congress? Has there ever existed a legislative body in this country that has acted with complete disregard and outright defiance of the people of this great nation?
First we were chastised for expecting our elected representatives to read the bills they vote on. How can anyone be expected to read all those pages, one democrat representative chided. Then we were told we had to pass the bill to know what was in it, by none other than the Speaker of the House. The health care bill being passed as the majority of America expressed their disapproval in polls, overwhelmingly in town hall meetings in the face of those they elected, and in outright protests, the type of which, in size and quantity, have not been seen since long haired hippies ruled our streets.
Then we found extensive passages in the health care bill that had nothing to do with health care, such as IRS filings for the small scale sale of precious metals. But more disgraceful than all this was the lame duck session after the election. A session hailed by the media and claimed as a victory by the democrats. Where the Congress, namely the democrats, passed bills that were in complete opposition to the desires of the people they represent. If they were, the bills would have been voted on before the election. The election results themselves proclaiming the disapproval of democrat party policies they acted in favor of.
I am unclear whether the States could actually petition the Supreme Court to negate the actions of a Congressional session, but if it is possible they would have no better a case than they do now. Many would argue it is the election process that rectifies such indiscretions, but is there no condemnation, consequence, of wrong doing called for? The actions of the 111th Congress have cost this nation and its people, subjecting them further to the oppressive yoke of big government, threatening their very liberty.
Because no action exists in a vacuum, the actions of this Congress deeply effect all the people of this nation, and the world, in one way or another. Perhaps the action of complete disregard for the will of the people holds larger consequence than any bill passed. We all impact the environment we live in and Jared Laughner's environment influenced him. It was not just his immediate environment, his isolation. As the media now claims, after trying to blame conservative ideals and those who promote them. But it was the environment we all have to deal with in our daily lives as citizens of this nation and world.
An environment where politicians say one thing, but then work towards contrary goals, acting in disregard to the desires of their constituents. Claiming divine right and becoming excessively rich from their positions, just because of the office they hold. Many showing little to no success themselves in the real world or their family/moral life.
An environment where the government, extolling the virtues of abortion, 'prepares' our young people for the free sex culture in elementary school. A government that claims religion a person practice, not to be expressed to the larger more enlightened public. While others promote chastity, the virtue of marriage, and the miracle of birth, giving praise and glory to God for the world He created.
An environment where the threat of terrorism from Muslim extremists is always on our mind, but the public in general must be scrutinized, no profiling allowed. And if we are going to give anyone exception to the invasive pat down policies at our airports it should be Muslim women in their unrevealing clothing, because Islam believes in modesty.... and other religions don't?
An environment where religion, that at one time proclaimed the 'absolutes' of the almighty God, now bows to political correctness, many major Christian faiths embracing homosexuality, among other things, as the way God created. An atmosphere where no one can judge or be judged. Where their is no right or wrong. I'm OK, you're OK, we are all OK.
Is Jared Laughner OK? Where did his nihilism originate? We are all interrelated and if you take an honest look at our society we can say with some confidence that the society at large encouraged his nihilistic world view.
And what of the environment of Arizona? My first reaction when hearing about the shooting of the Congress Woman was that it was related to the violence associated with our failed border policies. Or rather the lack of clear policy/action plan. Jared Laughner was living in an environment where violence went unchecked. Where no response equal to the magnitude of the problem was even close to being implemented. An environment of violence, chaos, and seemingly no way to rectify the situation.
We are all in this together. Everything we do has ramifications far beyond what we can imagine. And the idea that republicans and democrats of the 112th Congress should stand as one at the upcoming State of the Union address is no exception. It is a terrible idea. A destructive idea. The republicans, at least those who were elected by the Tea Party, and democrats believe in 'opposing' world views. They cannot exist together. Views that divided this world in two in the Cold War Era. They are contrary to each other and only one can be correct and history has already judged which is.
For the two parties with opposing views to stand as one is an extension of the confusion that our institutions, schools being the biggest, have been propagating since the sexual revolution of decades past. (Do the hippies still rule the streets? or rather the halls?) A contributing factor to the nihilism of Jared Laughner along with the socialist books and films he enjoyed. And like the policies the government promotes that suggest that you can't keep young children from pursuing sex, or that only government can solve our problems, holds profound implications for the future of this nation and world.
First we were chastised for expecting our elected representatives to read the bills they vote on. How can anyone be expected to read all those pages, one democrat representative chided. Then we were told we had to pass the bill to know what was in it, by none other than the Speaker of the House. The health care bill being passed as the majority of America expressed their disapproval in polls, overwhelmingly in town hall meetings in the face of those they elected, and in outright protests, the type of which, in size and quantity, have not been seen since long haired hippies ruled our streets.
Then we found extensive passages in the health care bill that had nothing to do with health care, such as IRS filings for the small scale sale of precious metals. But more disgraceful than all this was the lame duck session after the election. A session hailed by the media and claimed as a victory by the democrats. Where the Congress, namely the democrats, passed bills that were in complete opposition to the desires of the people they represent. If they were, the bills would have been voted on before the election. The election results themselves proclaiming the disapproval of democrat party policies they acted in favor of.
I am unclear whether the States could actually petition the Supreme Court to negate the actions of a Congressional session, but if it is possible they would have no better a case than they do now. Many would argue it is the election process that rectifies such indiscretions, but is there no condemnation, consequence, of wrong doing called for? The actions of the 111th Congress have cost this nation and its people, subjecting them further to the oppressive yoke of big government, threatening their very liberty.
Because no action exists in a vacuum, the actions of this Congress deeply effect all the people of this nation, and the world, in one way or another. Perhaps the action of complete disregard for the will of the people holds larger consequence than any bill passed. We all impact the environment we live in and Jared Laughner's environment influenced him. It was not just his immediate environment, his isolation. As the media now claims, after trying to blame conservative ideals and those who promote them. But it was the environment we all have to deal with in our daily lives as citizens of this nation and world.
An environment where politicians say one thing, but then work towards contrary goals, acting in disregard to the desires of their constituents. Claiming divine right and becoming excessively rich from their positions, just because of the office they hold. Many showing little to no success themselves in the real world or their family/moral life.
An environment where the government, extolling the virtues of abortion, 'prepares' our young people for the free sex culture in elementary school. A government that claims religion a person practice, not to be expressed to the larger more enlightened public. While others promote chastity, the virtue of marriage, and the miracle of birth, giving praise and glory to God for the world He created.
An environment where the threat of terrorism from Muslim extremists is always on our mind, but the public in general must be scrutinized, no profiling allowed. And if we are going to give anyone exception to the invasive pat down policies at our airports it should be Muslim women in their unrevealing clothing, because Islam believes in modesty.... and other religions don't?
An environment where religion, that at one time proclaimed the 'absolutes' of the almighty God, now bows to political correctness, many major Christian faiths embracing homosexuality, among other things, as the way God created. An atmosphere where no one can judge or be judged. Where their is no right or wrong. I'm OK, you're OK, we are all OK.
Is Jared Laughner OK? Where did his nihilism originate? We are all interrelated and if you take an honest look at our society we can say with some confidence that the society at large encouraged his nihilistic world view.
And what of the environment of Arizona? My first reaction when hearing about the shooting of the Congress Woman was that it was related to the violence associated with our failed border policies. Or rather the lack of clear policy/action plan. Jared Laughner was living in an environment where violence went unchecked. Where no response equal to the magnitude of the problem was even close to being implemented. An environment of violence, chaos, and seemingly no way to rectify the situation.
We are all in this together. Everything we do has ramifications far beyond what we can imagine. And the idea that republicans and democrats of the 112th Congress should stand as one at the upcoming State of the Union address is no exception. It is a terrible idea. A destructive idea. The republicans, at least those who were elected by the Tea Party, and democrats believe in 'opposing' world views. They cannot exist together. Views that divided this world in two in the Cold War Era. They are contrary to each other and only one can be correct and history has already judged which is.
For the two parties with opposing views to stand as one is an extension of the confusion that our institutions, schools being the biggest, have been propagating since the sexual revolution of decades past. (Do the hippies still rule the streets? or rather the halls?) A contributing factor to the nihilism of Jared Laughner along with the socialist books and films he enjoyed. And like the policies the government promotes that suggest that you can't keep young children from pursuing sex, or that only government can solve our problems, holds profound implications for the future of this nation and world.
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
Wikileaks, Anarchists, and Other Useful Pawns
In the mid 80's, a Church group I was working for hosted Sir John Noble on an anti-communism speaking tour. He gave his speech in the face of an oncoming hurricane. His route home blocked by the storm and his hotel being on the waterfront he had to spend the night at our Church residence. We all gathered there and he gave us his testimony throughout the turbulent night. When the lights went out we lit lanterns.
Sir John Noble spent the Second World War in a Nazi prison camp, his family being imprisoned upon the start of the war. After being 'liberated' by the Soviets he spent another ten years in labor camps under their... protection. During the course of his detention by the Soviets his family in the United States made unending inquiries to the State Department seeking information on his where abouts or possible fate. They claimed no knowledge of him on either count.
Eventually Sir John Noble was released. And in fact the State Department knew fairly accurately where he was during those long years. They had a file on him that would fill a drawer of a filing cabinet, so he claimed. Yet out of some diplomatic courtesy to the evil empire this information was never released or given to his worried family. Just some of the bull diplomacy breeds.
Wikileaks put out piles of information. Much had no particular significance. A lot was newsworthy, falling under the category of being classified to cover something that wasn't deemed beneficial for the current power structure under some supposed political or diplomatic reasoning. Why should any of that be hidden from the public in a government of, by and for the people?
But where is all the information on Area 51, and UFO's, and on the serious side our Vietnam MIA's and POW's? Like Sir John Noble's case before the time of computer filing unfortunately. Why should the public tolerate being lied to? And why if this Christian society believes they will have to answer for their entire life in the next world, nothing being hidden, do they create a society so full of secrets and hidden indiscretions?
Some of the released files could be deemed harmful to national security and/or the welfare of our troops in combat. But who is to blame for that information getting out? How long did this current administration know this was going to happen? And more importantly why didn't they do anything to stop the release of, if not all the information, the information that could be truly damaging to security?
Many see what they call the socialization of the United States; a coming tyranny. They look at the political tactics of the left and try to counter them in the playing field of politics following the rule book of what passes as good government today. The problem is the left has a different rule book of anything goes. The end justifies the means... Please make a list for me of the communist nations that did not come to power or were kept in power by violence. Armed revolution or the use of the military to suppress their own public.
And in this process of armed revolution it was the anarchist and the idealistic youth and intellectuals who lit the fire, created the chaos and instability and then were summarily suppressed when their role was complete. And Assange is the first to fall prey to this tactic as those seeking total control have recognized the threat of the Internet in thwarting their goals. This is why nothing was done to stop him and his organization. This is why nothing was done to stop the release of information that could cost our young soldiers and sailors their lives. It is part of a strategy to restrict and control the Internet.
And we see anarchists across Europe stirring up trouble. But here in the United States, where the left accuses the Tea Party of planning violence in one breadth and with the next calls for armed revolution against those on the right (blaming Bush all the while) there is no violence to speak of. Outside of a few campus protests on rising tuition's (much like in Europe) and isolated acts of terror, few and far between, inspired by the likes of Al Gore and other left leaning activists. The lack of escalation speaks more to the character of the people of the United States than that of the media or political talking heads.
And the left is missing one crucial piece of the puzzle in taking total control of the United States. That is control of the military. The repeal of 'don't ask don't tell' being the key step to accomplishing that goal. When 'don't ask don't tell' was passed it was written in such a way that it invited challenges in the court. And those challenges would have been complete some years past if not for one thing; 9/11. 9/11 and the subsequent wars put that tactic on the back burner and rather than our military numbers shrinking and becoming dominated by those driven by political correctness rather than love of nation, the numbers swelled with freedom loving Americans.
The homosexual movement is just one of many useful pawns in the atheistic socialist/communist left's drive for complete control. They are active, continually witnessing to their lifestyle before the entire public and it will be no different in the military. Openly gay individuals in the military will drastically change the spirit of our armed forces and who joins. It will be a military enslaved to political correctness rather than the public. A useful pawn.
Fortunately the politicalization of the military is far behind schedule or it could all be over. And what socialist/communist state ever supported homosexuality?
Sir John Noble spent the Second World War in a Nazi prison camp, his family being imprisoned upon the start of the war. After being 'liberated' by the Soviets he spent another ten years in labor camps under their... protection. During the course of his detention by the Soviets his family in the United States made unending inquiries to the State Department seeking information on his where abouts or possible fate. They claimed no knowledge of him on either count.
Eventually Sir John Noble was released. And in fact the State Department knew fairly accurately where he was during those long years. They had a file on him that would fill a drawer of a filing cabinet, so he claimed. Yet out of some diplomatic courtesy to the evil empire this information was never released or given to his worried family. Just some of the bull diplomacy breeds.
Wikileaks put out piles of information. Much had no particular significance. A lot was newsworthy, falling under the category of being classified to cover something that wasn't deemed beneficial for the current power structure under some supposed political or diplomatic reasoning. Why should any of that be hidden from the public in a government of, by and for the people?
But where is all the information on Area 51, and UFO's, and on the serious side our Vietnam MIA's and POW's? Like Sir John Noble's case before the time of computer filing unfortunately. Why should the public tolerate being lied to? And why if this Christian society believes they will have to answer for their entire life in the next world, nothing being hidden, do they create a society so full of secrets and hidden indiscretions?
Some of the released files could be deemed harmful to national security and/or the welfare of our troops in combat. But who is to blame for that information getting out? How long did this current administration know this was going to happen? And more importantly why didn't they do anything to stop the release of, if not all the information, the information that could be truly damaging to security?
Many see what they call the socialization of the United States; a coming tyranny. They look at the political tactics of the left and try to counter them in the playing field of politics following the rule book of what passes as good government today. The problem is the left has a different rule book of anything goes. The end justifies the means... Please make a list for me of the communist nations that did not come to power or were kept in power by violence. Armed revolution or the use of the military to suppress their own public.
And in this process of armed revolution it was the anarchist and the idealistic youth and intellectuals who lit the fire, created the chaos and instability and then were summarily suppressed when their role was complete. And Assange is the first to fall prey to this tactic as those seeking total control have recognized the threat of the Internet in thwarting their goals. This is why nothing was done to stop him and his organization. This is why nothing was done to stop the release of information that could cost our young soldiers and sailors their lives. It is part of a strategy to restrict and control the Internet.
And we see anarchists across Europe stirring up trouble. But here in the United States, where the left accuses the Tea Party of planning violence in one breadth and with the next calls for armed revolution against those on the right (blaming Bush all the while) there is no violence to speak of. Outside of a few campus protests on rising tuition's (much like in Europe) and isolated acts of terror, few and far between, inspired by the likes of Al Gore and other left leaning activists. The lack of escalation speaks more to the character of the people of the United States than that of the media or political talking heads.
And the left is missing one crucial piece of the puzzle in taking total control of the United States. That is control of the military. The repeal of 'don't ask don't tell' being the key step to accomplishing that goal. When 'don't ask don't tell' was passed it was written in such a way that it invited challenges in the court. And those challenges would have been complete some years past if not for one thing; 9/11. 9/11 and the subsequent wars put that tactic on the back burner and rather than our military numbers shrinking and becoming dominated by those driven by political correctness rather than love of nation, the numbers swelled with freedom loving Americans.
The homosexual movement is just one of many useful pawns in the atheistic socialist/communist left's drive for complete control. They are active, continually witnessing to their lifestyle before the entire public and it will be no different in the military. Openly gay individuals in the military will drastically change the spirit of our armed forces and who joins. It will be a military enslaved to political correctness rather than the public. A useful pawn.
Fortunately the politicalization of the military is far behind schedule or it could all be over. And what socialist/communist state ever supported homosexuality?
Thursday, November 04, 2010
Forward
Forward, the motto for Wisconsin. Let me give you my insight on my state.
It will be Wisconsin that leads this nation forward in conservative principles. Our new senator Ron Johnson, a manufacturer and accountant, defeated the incumbent and most liberal senator in office Russ Feingold, and has pledged he will not work for reelection but only to fix the problems of this nation. A man of accomplishment and character.
Many recognize the danger of new congressmen being co-opted by the beltway. It does not look possible in the case of Ron Johnson and he is not entering congress alone. Several Tea Party republicans won house seats and some real powerhouses have already held office for some time. An intellectual conservative giant Paul Ryan being one and a long time conservative, never wavering to the beltway, Jim Sensenbrenner another.
And behind them is a state government now lead by a new, do what he says, fiscally unfaltering conservative governor Scott Walker. Republicans took control of both state legislative bodies with large majorities, unseating the democrat leaders of both. Positioned to send Wisconsin from a depressed (due to democrat leadership) to booming economy as a testament to the whole nation of the value of conservative principles.
And the democrats will not gain power again for a very long time in Wisconsin. With tens of thousands of unverified names on the voter rolls Wisconsin has been a documented hotbed for voter fraud. It was the democrats who for many years stopped legislation for picture ID's to vote. Even stopping the placing of a second referendum on the ballot that would have given the people of Wisconsin the choice of making voter ID part of the state constitution, after the public overwhelmingly approved the first referendum. Two being required to change the state constitution.
Madison Wisconsin, the capital, has been called the Moscow of the United states and Milwaukee has been one of the few cities in the nation to actually elect a socialist mayor. Both the democrat candidate for governor and senate were betting on these liberal strongholds, and hotbeds of voter fraud, to take the election. Both losing by ten points they refused to concede late into the evening.
I live in the inner city district that votes overwhelmingly liberal. Dan Sebring the republican challenger to my congresswoman, Gwen Moore, held 68% of the vote. But that was with only 3% of the precincts reporting. Many other precincts, the liberal strongholds, being held open late as masses of questionable voters were rushed in creating lines. These results came in mass after about 50% of the statewide results were in. The ten point lead shrunk instantly to a five point lead. All with a motivated republican base. It stayed at five points the rest of the night. Dan Sebring in the end took only 30% of the vote in his district.
Picture ID to vote will become law in Wisconsin in short order under the republican leadership. Though called a blue or sometimes purple state, democrats have almost never won any statewide race with large margins. I believe those margins will disappear completely with a picture ID required to vote.
Even nationwide, without overwhelming majorities in inner cities across this country the democrats would never have held any power at all. This could all change quickly. How? The rise of a conservative evangelist in the black community is the only way I can imagine.
And in their victory speeches the conservative victors all gave thanks to God for this great nation. We should all give thanks. And keep praying for this country.
I'd like to share a bit of my prayer that I pray everyday without fail;
That good leaders rise up and evil leaders sink down.
That we (all men) need not tolerate evil leaders any longer.
That we can have leaders that are good, upright, and true.
That turn their hearts to you (God) in all things.
That are responsible to their constituents.
And serious about public funds.
It will be Wisconsin that leads this nation forward in conservative principles. Our new senator Ron Johnson, a manufacturer and accountant, defeated the incumbent and most liberal senator in office Russ Feingold, and has pledged he will not work for reelection but only to fix the problems of this nation. A man of accomplishment and character.
Many recognize the danger of new congressmen being co-opted by the beltway. It does not look possible in the case of Ron Johnson and he is not entering congress alone. Several Tea Party republicans won house seats and some real powerhouses have already held office for some time. An intellectual conservative giant Paul Ryan being one and a long time conservative, never wavering to the beltway, Jim Sensenbrenner another.
And behind them is a state government now lead by a new, do what he says, fiscally unfaltering conservative governor Scott Walker. Republicans took control of both state legislative bodies with large majorities, unseating the democrat leaders of both. Positioned to send Wisconsin from a depressed (due to democrat leadership) to booming economy as a testament to the whole nation of the value of conservative principles.
And the democrats will not gain power again for a very long time in Wisconsin. With tens of thousands of unverified names on the voter rolls Wisconsin has been a documented hotbed for voter fraud. It was the democrats who for many years stopped legislation for picture ID's to vote. Even stopping the placing of a second referendum on the ballot that would have given the people of Wisconsin the choice of making voter ID part of the state constitution, after the public overwhelmingly approved the first referendum. Two being required to change the state constitution.
Madison Wisconsin, the capital, has been called the Moscow of the United states and Milwaukee has been one of the few cities in the nation to actually elect a socialist mayor. Both the democrat candidate for governor and senate were betting on these liberal strongholds, and hotbeds of voter fraud, to take the election. Both losing by ten points they refused to concede late into the evening.
I live in the inner city district that votes overwhelmingly liberal. Dan Sebring the republican challenger to my congresswoman, Gwen Moore, held 68% of the vote. But that was with only 3% of the precincts reporting. Many other precincts, the liberal strongholds, being held open late as masses of questionable voters were rushed in creating lines. These results came in mass after about 50% of the statewide results were in. The ten point lead shrunk instantly to a five point lead. All with a motivated republican base. It stayed at five points the rest of the night. Dan Sebring in the end took only 30% of the vote in his district.
Picture ID to vote will become law in Wisconsin in short order under the republican leadership. Though called a blue or sometimes purple state, democrats have almost never won any statewide race with large margins. I believe those margins will disappear completely with a picture ID required to vote.
Even nationwide, without overwhelming majorities in inner cities across this country the democrats would never have held any power at all. This could all change quickly. How? The rise of a conservative evangelist in the black community is the only way I can imagine.
And in their victory speeches the conservative victors all gave thanks to God for this great nation. We should all give thanks. And keep praying for this country.
I'd like to share a bit of my prayer that I pray everyday without fail;
That good leaders rise up and evil leaders sink down.
That we (all men) need not tolerate evil leaders any longer.
That we can have leaders that are good, upright, and true.
That turn their hearts to you (God) in all things.
That are responsible to their constituents.
And serious about public funds.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)